Wednesday, August 2, 2023

HomeStreet: Stressed West Coast Small-Regional Bank, Pursuing a Sale

HomeStreet (HMST) ($180MM market cap) is a small regional lender based in Seattle that flew a bit too close to the sun in 2021-2022 and is now facing increased borrowing costs as they rely heavily on wholesale funding (loan-to-deposit ratio above 110%).  Their net-interest margin has been squeezed, as a result, they're a barely profitable enterprise despite minimal credit issues (ROE currently ~3%, versus 11.5% in 2022).  I first came across HomeStreet after it was briefly mentioned on the Value After Hours podcast by the team at Seawolf Capital.  Last night it moved up my watchlist because Bloomberg reported that HomeStreet is pursuing a sale, but also open to an asset sale or capital raise.  The speed of these troubled bank tie-ups seems to be increasing and regulators appear more open to mergers (BANC/PACW is guiding to a quick 6-month close).  I would expect this process will have an expedited timeline.  The simple/quick thesis that would make HomeStreet attractive to a buyer capable of fixing their funding problem:

  1. HMST trades for 1/3rd book value (~$9/share versus tangible book value at $27.50/share), despite having virtually no held-to-maturity portfolio and thus far, minimal issues in their loan book.  The tangible book number does include -$5.37/share of unrealized losses in the available-for-sale portfolio that will eventually burn off too.
  2. HMST has an attractive footprint across Seattle, southern California, Portland and a few branches in Hawaii where the deposit market is dominated by local players.  A larger regional bank could come in and realize significant synergies, especially in the current environment where regulators/politicians are once again more worried about shoring up the financial system than saving jobs or blocking branch closings.
  3. HMST is one of ~20 banks that has a license to originate and service multi-family loans under Fannie Mae's Delegated Underwriting and Servicing ("DUS") program.  This is an attractive franchise as Fannie Mae bears 2/3rds of the credit risk on a pro-rata basis while the lender maintains the relationship and associated servicing fees.

Other thoughts/risks:

  • 36% of their loan portfolio is multi-family lending in California.  Multi-family has held up reasonably well, we're starting to see some cracks in transitional bridge loans that mREITs fund, but too early to tell if troubles will work their way up to the MF CRE bank debt.  Typically, a transitional bridge loan is taken out with long-term financing by a bank when a property is stabilized.
  • Uninsured deposits were down to 7% of total deposits on 6/30, from 14% on 3/31, making a bank run here less worrisome (no venture or start up deposits), this is more a zombie bank that can't turn a profit or originate new loans.  HomeStreet is currently limiting lending to more niche floating rate products like construction loan and HELOCs.
  • Capital allocation has been exceptionally poor, HomeStreet has been a big buyer of their own shares in recent years, typically at prices well above book value. In 2022 alone, HomeStreet bought back 7.3% of their shares at an average price of $50.97/share.
  • HMST was recently kicked out of the S&P 600 small cap index which could have caused some forced selling pressure on the shares.  They also slashed the dividend significantly in April.

When a stock trades this cheap on a tangible book basis, the buyer can swoop it up for a huge discount, let's say 50% of book and still would be a 50% gain for the HMST equity.  I'm guessing this will be a stock-for-stock deal, so the realized premium might not be that big.  I bought some shares this morning.  Any other banks that need to make a deal?

Disclosure: I own shares of HMST 

32 comments:

  1. I missed a pretty big point. As of 3/31, their loan portfolio's fair value was ~$290MM below the carrying value. That's $15.40 a share. A fully adjusted book would be close to $12.00/share, that's what any buyer would have to mark down their portfolio in a merger.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If they do, my guess is there needs to be a drawn out pause. The economy needs some time to adjust to the current rates, HMST isn't the only bank that's significantly pulling back on lending.

      Delete
    2. Additionally if you were rather conservative and subtract the 7% uninsured deposits as well, you'd be looking at trouble here.

      Delete
    3. True, but that's a fairly small number, would be odd to have a commercial bank with no uninsured deposits. Plus that's a problem an acquiring bank could solve quickly.

      Delete
    4. I haven't had time to do the math, but isn't the fair value unlikely to recover for years unless interest rates decline significantly? Am I right in thinking that nearly all of that fair value gap has to be in the half that is their longest duration mortgages in their LHFI portfolio, ie 3-5 years and 5-15 years duration pools? So waiting for their duration to fall and narrow the valuation gap to stated book value would take a long time.

      Delete
    5. Correct, but an acquirer would take that longer view. 5 years isn't a long time in the real business world, at my day job (a bank), we still refer to certain segments bought 10 years ago as legacy-XYZ bank. I'm not saying someone is going to pay book value, but there's a big discount here that a deal could make sense for both parties.

      Delete
    6. In the latest Q, fair value for LHFI dropped another ~40%, or $120m. Ouch.

      Delete
    7. Always confusing that people characterize below-market-fifteen-year assets as an "accounting issue."

      Delete
  2. Again kicking the same tires, I was buying some of this today. DUS license seems like a valuable asset even separate from zombie bank.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It is a unique asset for a small regional bank, but I don't know how to value it, open to any suggestions around that.

      Delete
    2. Blue lion (activist fund in HMST) thinks the DUS license is worth $100-150m. Selling would obviously create a lot of value.

      Delete
    3. https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/blue-lion-capital-comments-on-the-decision-by-homestreets-board-to-reject-dwight-capitals-offer-to-acquire-its-fannie-mae-dus-business-and-related-servicing-300867087.html

      Thanks - I did see that Blue Lion put out the above letter, been making its way around today.

      Delete
  3. I'm having some difficulty on this one. Is my math totally off?

    While HMST has some very attractive assets and a great set of locations, an acquisition would mark the LHFI down to fair value (a ~465m gap), which would drop book to ~$3.50/sh. That would seem to take acquisition off the table.

    I do agree with Blue Lion that selling the DUS license and restructuring balance sheet could turn this situation around in a hurry -- but is that the only way forward now? I'd love the optionality of acquisition or DUS license sell, now I'm not so sure the first option is viable.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It does make it a challenge, the Q2 mark is a little disappointing in my mind. Might take the acquisition off the table, you're not wrong. I still think it would make economic sense, but the accounting treatment might not make it viable for an acquirer.

      Delete
    2. Thanks for your thoughts, and share, @MDC. I still believe there's a lot of value in the $HMST franchise and asset base. I'm still determining if the bet makes sense if it hinges on trusting Mr. Mason to do the right thing (sell DUS). More work to do on my end!

      Delete
    3. I wonder if the pacw treatment, with the distressed shell the accounting acquirer/survivor if not the de-facto buyer, could pull another rabbit from a hat here. Pacw situation was less grim than hmst imo.

      Delete
  4. Why the stock down today? any news?

    ReplyDelete
  5. On the subject of banks–I'd recommend looking into EWBC as well. It has good presence here on the west coast and is a pretty stable bank. One of the few in the US with a full banking license in China. They didn't have much venture exposure and the deposit base didn't involve tech startups from the valley, yet the price got hammered unfairly early this year (albeit it has recovered quiet a bit). Might be a bit expensive now and doesn't exactly fit into a special sits. bucket but worth keeping an eye on.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Li Lu added to his position last quarter. Any views on their Cali CRE exposure? Anecdotally seeing headlines about 80%+ declines in asset values over the last few years (example from another bank https://therealdeal.com/sanfrancisco/2023/05/09/sks-buys-350-california-street-in-san-francisco-paying-60m-to-68m/). Even a conservative lender can have trouble in that kind of air pocket.

      Delete
    2. Around 40% of their total loans is in CRE (around ~$20B total) but the exposure is very well diversified. multi-family residency, retail and industrial make up 26% of it. Office is only 4.7%, so it looks relatively safe to me. The ROE, BV growth is extremely impressive too.

      Delete
  6. https://mma.prnewswire.com/media/2216330/Letter_to_HMST_Shareholders_20230920.pdf?p=original

    Letter from Blue Lion. Outlining that an asset sale that would somehow unlock the DUS license would be the best option forward.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1518715/000151871523000166/sept222023pressrelease.htm

      HMST's response:
      "On September 15, 2023, the Company received an unsolicited non-binding written proposal to purchase our DUS Business (including our related loan servicing portfolio carried at $32 million on June 30, 2023) from a third party group for $57 million (the “DUS Purchase Proposal”). One of the members of this third party group was recommended to us by Mr. Griege in a prior letter to our Board of Directors.

      Our Board of Directors and management have analyzed the DUS Purchase Proposal and determined that the price proposed was inadequate in relation to the resulting benefit and value of the DUS Business to our Company and as such a sale of our DUS Business at this price was not in the best interests of the Company."

      Delete
  7. Disappointed that HMST doesn't seem too inclined to sell their DUS license. MDC, are you considering adding to this position?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No, I'm not, just holding. This is a particularly risky idea, I could see a world where it is seized by the FDIC, need to be careful and not continually average down.

      Delete
  8. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1518715/000151871524000025/finalpressrelease1152023fi.htm

    Merger with FirstSun Capital, structured similar to BANC/PACW.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Not sure if you are still involved but thought it was weird that they did not mention HMST at all in earnings report, specifically mentioned it on previous print.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I do still own it and you're right, a little concerning that there's no mention.

      Delete
    2. Seems like the merger might be off, based on the PR after-hours today.

      Delete
    3. Yeah, good call, the drama around this bank doesn't stop. From the sounds of it, looks like the regulatory shopping that FSUN was doing did them in? I don't think this is because of HMST specifically, could be a similar opportunity to FHN, although FHN is a high quality bank. But HMST can likely find another dance partner if this deal does indeed break fully.

      Delete