So Merrimack sold their commercial business in Onivyde (along with a generic version of Doxil) to Ipsen (IPSEY) for $575MM in cash at closing, $33MM in near term milestone payments related to Onivyde sales through their licensing agreement with Shire (originally Baxalta), and up to $450MM in contingency payments based on additional regulatory approvals for Onivyde. Following the sale, the company's plan was return cash to shareholders via a special dividend, pay off most of their debt, and refocus the company as a development stage biotech again. The deal closed in early April, a $140MM special dividend was paid and their senior notes have been redeemed. Today the company's market cap is roughly $200MM, or about the same as net cash following the closing of the Onivyde sale and resulting special dividend.
The company will now have a few different shots on goal, to be clear, this is all very speculative at this point and I know very little about the chances of any of these milestones being reached or the drugs in their pipeline ever being approved and commercialized.
Merrimack's board of directors has committed to passing through to shareholders any payments received net of taxes related to the Ispen deal in the form of special dividends. In essence, these will function like contingent value right payments, but they're stapled together with the common shares and the company could go back on their word and find other uses for the cash in the future.
The three milestone payments are as follows:
- $225MM for FDA approval in first-line pancreatic cancer
- $150MM for FDA approval in small cell lung cancer
- $75MM for FDA approval in any third indication
There doesn't appear to be a deadline on any of these, at least one that's worrisome, that's good as it prevents Ipsen from delaying the approvals until just after the milestone date expires.
Milestone 1 is in a phase 2 trial, milestone is just beginning a phase 3 trial, and milestone 3 has a couple in phase 1 or beginning stages of phase 1 trials, translation, all are probably years away from potentially materializing. Merrimack's financial advisers in the transaction estimated the probability weighted NPV of Ispen's offer at $685MM, with $575MM upfront and the Shire milestone payments of $33MM likely to hit this year, the bankers put the NPV of the contingency payments at roughly $77MM. Seems fairly reasonable assuming a low-to-mid probability on either 1 or 2 being met in 3-4 year time and then discounting that back pretty heavily.
As part of Merrimack's restructuring, they've narrowed their pipeline to the three most promising anti-cancer products which they plan to focus their attention now as a new development stage company:
These three are also pretty distant catalysts, MM-121 has failed three phase 2 trials in non-small cell lung cancer, ovarian cancer, and breast cancer, so they're running out of options for that drug. I'm curious to hear others thoughts on these three programs and their prospects as the company even after the restructuring is only funded through the end of 2019 - developing oncology drugs is extremely expensive.
Merrimack also has convertible debt outstanding, as part of the Ipsen deal the company eliminated their senior notes but conveniently left out any mention of their convertible debt, the convertible holders were understandably unhappy with the company. Merrimack sold off their one commercial drug, bypassed them and distributed cash to shareholders, reducing the collateral backing the convertible notes which significantly increases the probability of default. Bondholders are suing the company and as a result, Merrimack escrowed $60MM -- or about the amount it would take to redeem the upset bondholders. The convertible bonds might be an interesting special situation in their own right, they trade in the upper 60s, way out of the money with a strike price of $6.25, have a 4.5% coupon, and if the lawsuit is successful they could be redeemed at par by year end. If Merrimack is successful however, then the $60MM (or $0.45/share) will be distributed to shareholders as an additional special dividend.
Prior to the special dividend that's already been paid, MACK was trading between $3.30-$3.70 per share, after the $1.06 dividend it sold off down to $1.44 as of today, so roughly $0.80-$1.20 has come off the stock price for no other reason than the asset sale was completed and the dividend was paid. There are a lot of upset retail shareholders and other day trader types in the stock, but it looks to be cheap and some forced selling happening after the restructuring has taken place as holders reassessed whether they wanted a pre-revenue stage biotech -- its almost like old spinoff selling dynamics taking place after the dividend was paid.
But at net cash, with new management taking over who were just issued a new options package, and the possibility of future contingent payments related to Onivyde, Merrimack seems like an another interesting speculation to add to my broken biotech bucket. It'll be about 3 years before we know how this bucket turns out and that's likely a big part of the discount, but I think/hope I have the patience and ability to wait it out.
Disclosure: I own shares of MACK
Good article. I'll look more into Merrimack. I find it hard to understand value of biotech stocks - it almost comes down to separating uncertainty vs risk on these stocks. Merrimack seems to have uncertainty but not much risk of capital loss based on your article.ReplyDelete
Have you looked at Keryx? I first noticed it when Baupost bought a big stake. They have single drug approved - phosphate binder for dialysis patients. They had two big issues - a. slow sales ramp as they built their salesforce, and b. supply interruption. Market over-reacted on both of these issues and pushed stock down a lot. Its cheap even without considering upside from label expansion as oral iron drug.
I haven't, thanks for the idea, will take a look.Delete
Here is an article that highlighted the issues you mentioned from over a year ago: https://seekingalpha.com/article/4002315-keryx-biopharmaceuticals-highly-asymmetric-bet-long-term-investorDelete
Looks like it has performed well since then.
The bond prospectus specifically allows dividends so it looks like the note holders will be arguing the provision requiring repurchase on a fundamental change - "any sale, lease or other transfer in one transaction or a series of transactions of all or substantially all of the consolidated assets of us and our subsidiaries, taken as a whole, to any person other than one of our subsidiaries;"ReplyDelete
On a quick reading it appears low probability that they succeed in forcing redemption.
Thanks, I didn't see the bond prospectus, feels like they should have a gripe but I know bondholders tend to get worked over in these scenarios.Delete
By net cash, what do you mean exactly? It looks like the stock trades at gross cash (135mm cash and 132mm shares pre split).ReplyDelete
They escrowed $60MM for the convertible note lawsuit, that shows up in restricted cash now, but is (maybe) likely to be paid out to shareholders later this year if MACK wins the judgment. Plus they have $33MM coming from Shire this year as well.Delete
So roughly 9.38 per share of net cash (cash + restricted + 33mm minus all liabilities). So essentially paying $3 per share for upto $35/share in CVR plus whatever value the base business has.Delete
Yep, that's the basic idea. Plus hopefully that $60MM gets paid out as a special dividend at the end of the year, pulls forward some return, makes the stub even cheaper.Delete
Settled with the convertible noteholders, no special dividend, but taking them out at 90 cents on the dollar. Not the outcome I was hoping for.
MDC--Is there anything new with MACK. I haven't seen anything. Thanks.ReplyDelete
No, nothing new. Probably won't be anything new for some time.Delete
Any thoughts on MACK shelf agreement? I'm still a little concerned given that the stock doesn't trade below Cash minus liabilities.ReplyDelete
I don't like it. Dilutes the CVR-like payments from Ipsen, the terms of the initial deal have changed twice now, first with the converts being paid out and now with the CVR being diluted via the shelf raise to pay for three semi-long shots. I'll probably look to exit.Delete
Any thoughts on MACK still? A pretty significant amount of potential milestone payments but only about a $1 in net cash (trading at $3). I am also not sure if $4mm quarterly burn is on going which would deplete the company pretty soon.ReplyDelete