Many readers will know this situation, Altisource Asset Management (AAMC) is a cash shell with approximately $80MM in the bank after their only asset management client, Front Yard Residential (RESI), terminated their external management agreement with AAMC resulting in RESI being internalized (AAMC was a 2012 spin, was trendy at the time to spin the management company). Front Yard later sold itself to private equity (Ares and Pretium) which likely will turn out to be a great deal (even after they hiked the offer) for the buyers given how single family rentals have traded since. Friend of the blog, Andrew Walker did an excellent podcast (and even answered one of my questions on it) with Thomas Braziel and Jeff Moore pitching AAMC. They go into some of the background, particularly on the controversial Bill Erbey, who was formerly an executive (back in the early-to-mid 2010s, Erbey ran Ocwen and a few satellite entities like AAMC), but now is *just* a 39% shareholder in AAMC after legal trouble forced him out of the day-to-day operations.
Long story short, Altisource has a large preferred overhang (originally $250MM, currently $150MM after two exchanges), the stock previously traded north of $1000/share (now for $17.90) and issued a zero coupon convertible preferred stock with a strike price of $1250. The cash from the convertible preferred was used to buyback shares, presumably to boost the shares above the strike price making everyone happy, but instead the stock collapsed. Now that piece of paper is hopelessly out of the money, it is basically a zero coupon bond with a mandatory redemption date of 3/15/44. However starting in March 2020, every five years the preferred holders can request a full redemption:
(b) Each holder, at its option, shall have the right, in its sole discretion, to require the Corporation to redeem all of its outstanding Series A Preferred Shares by providing written notice to the Corporation within fifteen (15) Business Days (but not more than thirty (30) Business Days) prior to a Redemption Date of its intent to cause the Corporation to redeem such holder’s Series A Preferred Shares on such Redemption Date (each, a “Holder Redemption Notice”) which will specify (i) the name of the holder delivering such Holder Redemption Notice and (ii) that such holder is exercising its option, pursuant to this Section 5, to require the Corporation to redeem shares of Series A Preferred Shares held by such holder. The Corporation shall, within fifteen (15) Business Days of receipt of such Holder Redemption Notice, deliver to the holder exercising its rights to require redemption of the Series A Preferred Shares a notice specifying the date set for such redemption, which date shall be no more than thirty (30) Business Days after the Holder Redemption Notice (the "Holder Redemption Date"). The Corporation shall redeem for cash on the Holder Redemption Date, out of funds legally available therefor, all, but not less than all, of the outstanding Series A Preferred Shares held by such holder at an amount equal to the Redemption Price.
The larger holders did indeed request redemption last year. But the trick is AAMC has to redeem the entire class at once, and obviously they can't redeem the $150MM outstanding with only $80MM in net cash. The preferred stock is closely held, two holders (Putnam and Wellington) have settled with AAMC and exchanged for either a combination of cash and stock in the case of Putnam or just cash in the case of Wellington. Both worked out to approximately 11-12 cents on the dollar. The remaining significant holdout is Luxor Capital which is pursuing litigation against AAMC.
I have never subscribed to the "preferred stock has no teeth" thesis, here is where my views differ (again, I'm often totally wrong):
- Luxor is not anchored in any way to the previous two settlements, they're the largest holder (basically the only remaining holder) of the preferred stock and still have leverage. I'm a structured finance guy, they're almost the "controlling class" in this situation, without them the overhang isn't resolved. Additionally, Putnam included a "most favored nation" clause in their settlement which effectively hitches their settlement to Luxor, it gets Putnam out of the lawsuit but also allows them to retain the optionality of a better deal.
- Altisource won't risk consummating a new business combination/merger before the preferred stock overhang is resolved. If the deal is successful, then AAMC could potentially be on the hook for the full $150MM down the road or at a minimum increases the recovery rate for Luxor. I don't see anything happening until Luxor settles, maybe there's a settlement and merger simultaneously but it feels highly unlikely that the preferred can just sit out there until 2044 (for either side). So this is a game of chicken until then, and those situations can last longer than people want to believe (I would have thought RHE would have settled by now).
Here's the current situation, obviously the capital structure is upside down at full face for the preferred, I'm discounting the net cash for two quarters of cash burn, dealers choice there.
How I'm thinking about a post-settlement proforma: I'm assuming that the Putnam settlement is the best case. Putnam held $81.8MM of the preferred stock and received 288,283 shares of stock and $2.863MM in cash (split in two payments), if we applied that ratio to the remaining $150MM outstanding, I get about a $25 NAV.
But if Luxor was going to settle for the Putnam deal, they would have already, so applying a multiple to that, let's say they negotiate a 25% or 50% better deal than Putnam, I get an NAV of $23.28 and $21.50 respectively. Against a $17.90 stock, that seems like a reasonable discount, if you did a goal seek on the multiplier to get to the current price, Luxor would need to strike a deal more than 100% better than Putnam (also includes the incremental benefit to Putnam for MFN clause) to get to the current share price.
Mr. Thomas K. McCarthy, Interim Chief Executive Officer, stated, “The Company’s attention and focus continues to be the evaluation and pursuit of certain business opportunities and acquisition targets in which to focus the Company’s resources and enhance shareholder value. The Company has liquidated its equity holdings and is now in an all-cash position in preparation of an acquisition event.During the third quarter, the Company also engaged the services of both an investment bank, Cowen and Company, LLC, and the law firm, Norton Rose Fulbright, LLP, to assist us in identifying and reviewing potential acquisition and merger opportunities. While no final decision has been made, the Company is in discussions with several potential acquisition or merger targets including cryptocurrency and brokerage related businesses”.
The company is probably mid-process, I'm guessing that a settlement with Luxor is announced at the same time (if they take shares, they could participate in the upside, removing the litigation overhang will likely cause the stock to bounce significantly), plus there are some "meme able" buzzwords in there and a relatively low float, I agree that something crazy could happen with this one and at today's price you're not paying much, if anything, for that optionality. But there are hundreds of SPACs also competing for similar buzzy deals, so who knows, could be challenging to get a deal done and there could be a frustratingly long stretch with no news.
Disclosure: I own shares of AAMC
Wrote this prior to the delisting 8-K, looks like it'll potentially going OTC.
...and still halted, egg on my face, not the first time with these (see MDLY).Delete
Not a big deal. All of China will be going OTC soon if SEC has it's way.Delete
Do you know if this will be tradable on Fidelity/IBKR once OTC? Seems to be hit or miss. I sold out a couple days after last settlement hoping to see it again in the teens.Delete
I don't know when it'll tradable again, I had the same thought as you (although I didn't own it prior to the last settlement), was hoping to see it in the teens again, thought I got a great price around $18 and minutes later it was halted.Delete
It will be fun to see how this one plays out. Assuming they get through the legal saga ok, and without burning too much cash, they will have to compete with 554 SPACs looking for a deal. Maybe they’ll buy something crypto related from Erby, but then you have related party transaction issues with a guy that’s been banned from public markets. Such a low float and such high uncertainty, this thing could easily have an exaggerated move either direction.ReplyDelete
Yep. Ha, I agree, but I'm attracted to it in the teens, just wish I bought it after it delisted.Delete
Thanks for the write-up! Are you planning to buy more of it if it is tradeable OTC ?Delete
Maybe? Hard to really comment without knowing the price.Delete
The last tiny non-Luxor settlement, I view this as mostly non-news, still think Luxor holds all the cards and doesn't care what the others settle for.
Any thoughts on the latest news?ReplyDelete
Sorry, I was out last week, posted some brief comments on twitter on the night the news came out, slightly disappointed. They had previously hinted at providing hard money loans, so that's nothing new, the crypto ATMs seems like a sad attempt to appeal to meme traders, but that didn't work. I'm still holding, but yeah, not excited by that announcement, not sure what took them months to come up with it.Delete