The thesis remains intact for most of my current holdings, instead of just repeating those ideas, below are some additional thoughts on previously mentioned companies that I've sold/passed on:
- Comdisco Holding (CDCO): Comdisco made its first liquidation payment in several years on 3/12/2015, the price jumped up to the point where it made sense to sell because I think the remaining liquidation payments will drag out longer than expected. The market might have overreacted to the switch to liquidation based accounting and the word "imminent", but later in their 10-Q they mention its projected that all regulatory filings to wrap things up would be completed within "the next few years". Based on the current estimated liquidation value of $4.55, the current price of $4.30 is pricing distributions coming sooner than later.
- Exelis (XLS): Harris Corporation (HRS) announced the acquisition of Exelis on 2/6/2015 for $23.75 per share, unfortunately I missed this deal by a few weeks as my calls expired in January. I exercised, sold, and moved on. As they say, with options you need to get both the price and timing the right. Exelis in hindsight was a good example of the parent in a spinoff shedding an underperforming segment (Vectrus) that was obscuring the true value of the business. Lesson, especially in the current market, is to pay just as much attention to the parent as savvy management can take advantage of the market's appetite for spinoffs to streamline their business.
- Real Industry (RELY) (f/k/a Signature Holdings): Based on the current market price of $11.35, I've clearly missed this one, I even took another look at it after the rights offering was completed and it briefly went back below $6.00 per share and passed again. I still have questions about management and their promotional style, but it's clearly worked so far, its been the perfect combination of an NOL shell, cyclical business hitting its stride, and the recent love for anything SPAC/roll-up. Green Brick Partners (GRBK) has a few of these qualities and done fantastically since the rights offering too - I have 1 or 2 others in mind that could follow a similar playbook.
- Retail Holdings (RHDGF): I sold Retail Holdings earlier in the spring, it was one of my smaller holdings and I just decided to purge it instead of adding to it as the delayed liquidation up against the backdrop of a big bull market has tested just about anyone's patience. In June, they made two sales of the more liquid holdings under the Singer Asia umbrella leaving the controlling stakes in Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, India, and Pakistan. The question for me still remains, why couldn't they get the deal done in 2013? Did someone look under the hood and find something they didn't like? What's changed since then? I still believe in the general thesis, just decided to move on and pursue other higher conviction ideas.
|*TGNA calls haven't traded since they were adjusted for the spin; current price is the underlying value with no premium|
Nice performance! Any thoughts on WMIH? it seems to be teed up for an acquisition announcement and with $6B in NOLs, could be quite interesting.ReplyDelete
PARR: How do you get comfortable with such a concentrated, non diversified business? it's a one trick pony after all.
Totally agree with you on spin off theme and I think the same could be said about activist theme. I wonder if shoeshine boys now ask questions about these themes from customers...
You read between the lines there, yes, I like WMIH, hoping it comes down a little bit more so you're not paying quite as much for the NOL, but it does look like it could be quite interesting.Delete
With PARR I get comfortable by sizing it right. Plus I like the geographical barriers to entry, in remote locations like Hawaii you tend to get less competition and higher margins. I'm curious what will happen with the Chevron refinery but I also think PARR will continue to make acquisitions and move away from being a one trick pony. It's come down substantially in the last week or so, could be a good buying opportunity.
Thanks for the comment.
wonder if you have looked at CC - Here is one take on it..ReplyDelete
Link to article: http://tinyurl.com/o27eqae
Great post, I haven't looked at CC yet. I assumed it was one of the "garbage barge" spinoffs of recent vintage, but that's a compelling case.Delete
Hey , you know what they say, one man's garbage.... Of course it has a boat load of "hair' on it; the question is 1. Is it good for a trade for post-spin dynamic? and 2. Can this survive the cycle without distress or equity dilution? because if it can, then multi-bagger potential I think.Delete
Nice "hit" on JMG!ReplyDelete
Thanks! Yeah, funny how that happens seems to happen with the lower conviction investments but I'll definitely take it.Delete