On 1/26/17, Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) won the bidding war against Sanofi for Actelion (ALIOY), a Switzerland based biotechnology company led by Jean-Paul Clozel whose main drug is Tracleer which treats aterial pulmonary hypertension. Johnson & Johnson is paying $30B or $280 per share ($70 equivalent for the ADR), but the interesting aspect is immediately before the deal is completed, Actelion will spinoff their R&D pipeline of 14 products, most of which are years away from potential commercialization.
Often in biotech or pharmaceutical mergers the bid-ask spread is wide because the target believes in their R&D pipeline far more than the acquirer is willing to pay for it. This problem is often solved with a contigent value right (CVR) that pays off if a drug in development meets certain targets, the CVR bridges the valuation gap. The spinoff (or demerger as they're called outside the U.S.) contemplated by the Johnson & Johnson/Actelion deal functions very similar to the a CVR, Jean-Paul Clozel believes in his product pipeline far more than Johnson & Johnson was willing to pay for it. Per the offer prospectus that was released last week, the spinoff was essentially a condition of sale for Actelion:
On October 18, 2016, Mr. Gorsky sent a second letter to Mr. Garnier in which J&J proposed to acquire all Actelion Shares at a revised price per share. On October 25, 2016 the Board of Directors, together with representatives of Niederer Kraft & Frey, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz (“Wachtell Lipton”) and Slaughter and May, met to discuss the revised proposal and, after thorough consideration of the revised proposal, determined that the revised offer price did not reflect Actelion’s intrinsic value. In particular, the Board of Directors believed that the revised proposal continued to undervalue Actelion’s preclinical discovery and clinical pipeline business, and that, while Actelion would be willing to engage in discussions concerning a transaction with J&J, Actelion would require a higher indicative offer price before engaging further. Following the meeting, Mr. Garnier conveyed this decision to Mr. Gorsky.
Mr. Garnier and Mr. Gorsky remained in contact in late October and the first half of November 2016. Mr. Garnier continued to express to Mr. Gorsky the Board of Directors’ concern that J&J’s prior proposals failed to provide adequate value for Actelion’s preclinical discovery and clinical pipeline business. In order to bridge the valuation gap, Mr. Garnier proposed the Demerger as part of an alternative transaction structure, in which Actelion would spin off its preclinical discovery and clinical pipeline business prior to Actelion’s acquisition by J&J. The representatives of J&J expressed their willingness to consider the Demerger structure, but indicated that the complexity of the Demerger, as compared to straight-forward acquisition, would require additional time to negotiate.The spinoff, currently dubbed "R&D NewCo", will be capitalized with CHF 420MM in cash from Actelion prior to the spinoff and Johnson & Johnson will contribute another CHF 580MM in the form of a convertible loan, part of which will convert immediately to a 16% ownership in R&D NewCo with the other 84% owned by prior Actelion shareholders. The remaining loan will be convertible to another 16% of R&D NewCo by Johnson & Johnson at any time for 10 years. So while R&D NewCo will be independent, they'll have a built in partner in Johnson & Johnson to advance their pipeline to commercialization.
I don't know much about R&D NewCo's pipeline, but I'd encourage anyone interested to watch Actelion's CEO Jean-Paul Clozel's remarks in the deal announcement press conference:
He owns 3.6% of Actelion, Johnson & Johnson is paying $30B for the company, he's set to get paid over $1B in cash for his shares, yet he's going to R&D NewCo and sounds excited to get back to early stage research and be relieved of the sales and marketing overhead of running a commercial pharmaceutical company.
There was report in the days following the merger announcement that Actelion's Uptravi drug was linked to 5 deaths in France, but those concerns have seemed to be pushed aside as it came out that Johnson & Johnson knew of the issue ahead of time and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) recommend on 2/10/17 that the drug could continue to be used despite the probe into the deaths.
The Material Adverse Effect clauses seem fairly standard to my novice eye:
A Material Adverse Effect means a reduction of:
(i) the annual consolidated earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT) of CHF 98.3 million – which is an amount equal to 15% of the consolidated EBIT of the Company and its Subsidiaries in the financial year 2015 as per the Company’s annual report 2015 – or more;
(ii) the annual consolidated sales of CHF 204.5 million – which is an amount equal to 10% of the consolidated sales of the Company and its Subsidiaries in the financial year 2015 as per the Company's annual report 2015 – or more.
When determining whether a Material Adverse Effect has occurred with respect to the Company and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, the following changes in circumstances, events, facts or occurrences shall not be taken into account, individually or together:
(i) any circumstance, event, fact or occurrence in the industries in which the Company and its Subsidiaries operate or in the economy generally, except to the extent (and only to the extent) that such circumstance, event, fact or occurrence disproportionately affects the Company or any of its Subsidiaries relative to other participants in the industry in which the Company and its Subsidiaries operate; or
(ii) any circumstance, event, fact or occurrence that arises from or relates to R&D NewCo, the R&D Business or any of the Transferring Business Assets or Assumed Liabilities, in each case as defined in the Demerger Agreement, except to the extent (and only to the extent) such circumstance, event, fact or occurrence affects any other aspect of the Company or its Subsidiaries; or
(iii) any circumstance, event, fact or occurrence that arises from or relates to the commencement of sales of a generic form of Bosentan (marketed by the Company as Tracleer) in the United States.
Johnson & Johnson has a lot of cash overseas, this deal helps solve some of that problem as we all wait for the new administration to change repatriation tax laws. This deal seems fully vetted by both sides and fairly safe to close, the offer prospectus puts the earliest close date at 5/5/17, but seems likely that might get pushed back to June based on the initial guidance.
The ADRs which represent 1/4th a share currently trade for $67, representing a 4.4% absolute return to the $70 offer price, the spinoff is worth something, let's call it $1B for another $2.30 per ADR or ~$9 per Actelion share traded on SIX in Switzerland. Add in the spinoff, and the current spread represents an 8% return by the end of June. I could also see R&D NewCo being sold off indiscriminately after the deal closes as it's rather tiny compared to the overall deal and traditional arbritrages don't want to hold a development stage biotech longer than needed. So this could be a two staged investment, capture the deal spread, and then reinvest some of the proceeds into R&D NewCo.
Disclosure: I own shares of ALIOY
great stuff. Will be interesting to see at what levels the R&D NewCo will be trading.ReplyDelete
I've also started noticing and participating in some of these deals. The R&D aspects of many of these deals is often not priced in to many deals. It's sort of a twist on the Mohnish Pabrai style of investing in that we are investing in uncertain but not necessarily risky ventures (because we are buying these R&D vehicles for free or less than nothing).ReplyDelete
One successful deal involved buying $PIP which was owed litigation proceeds. One could have bought $PIP stock for less than the litigation amount paid out to shareholders while receiving an unknown (but substantial) value for the ex-dividend stock.
An interesting deal but probably a little bit too speculative is $MACK. They are selling their main asset (in an asset sale) but are distributing a large amount of the proceeds to shareholders after earmarking a large amount for future R&D and debt reduction. Dividend amount could be between $1.5-1.95. In addition to owning the proforma company the company also has the option to receive milestone payments on the asset they just sold. If stock were probably in the less than $2.5 range it would be kind of interesting. Less than $2 and it would be extremely interesting.
I've also spent some time researching MACK and think it could be another interesting cheap look at the R&D pipeline. My main concern is they appear to have tried to sell themselves outright but couldn't find any buyers, so they're reluctantly returning to a development stage company versus at Actelion it was a condition for them to sell themselves. Position of strength versus position of weakness. Thanks for the great comment, and please let me know if you find any similar situations.Delete
I think you have a typo in the second paragraph. J&J is paying $280 per share, not $260.ReplyDelete
Thanks for the post.
Good catch, thanks, updated.Delete
Assuming it's valued at cash ($1 billion), spinoff stub would be worth ~$6.50 per Actelion common since J&J technically will own 32% (fully diluted) of R&D NewCo's capitalization.
The sound logic holds regardless. Getting the stub for free. A stub, as it were, which most institutionals won't care much for since (a) 1/30th of their Actelion position and (b) monthly performance benchmarking meaning zero patience for Clozier to develop that drug pipeline
How are you assuming the ADRs will be treated? Is it possible that they are terminated and you are forced to take delivery of the foreign shares? Why not own the foreign shares?ReplyDelete
I don't have an assumption, could be the way you describe or maybe the ADR converts to the spin and you get paid the cash, either way you'd get the value somehow. There's a slight discount for the ADR compared to the foreign shares, probably accounts for a cancellation fee? I don't have access to the Swiss exchange through my broker, otherwise I'd probably own the foreign shares to avoid any of these questions too. But in the end, I think you get the value in the end.Delete
How do you get to a $1bn valuation?ReplyDelete
Nothing fancy, they're contributing $1B (CHF) to the R&D NewCo, as an earlier commenter mentioned, JNJ effectively owns 32% of that, so it's $6.50 per full Actelion share. Plus you'd have to give some value for the IP that's be transferred along with the cash. I didn't get scientific about it.Delete
I wouldn't quite call the spinoff 'free' but generally agree with your thesis. The discount on the shares seems large. Here is another writeup about the deal.ReplyDelete
Thanks, nice write-up as well. Yes, it's not really "free" - it's built into the spread - but the spread to just the cash offer seemed attractive at time, let alone throwing in the small spinoff on top of it.Delete
Thank you for the write up. I always enjoy reading all of them. Do you know if ALIOY ADRs are registered shares and whether or not they will be allowed to participate?ReplyDelete
The tender offer expired on April 21. Since then, the share price has been dropping again towards the CHF270 mark. Any idea why that happens? Buying now would represent an even bigger IRR than buying 2 months ago - if you considered holding until the cash-out + spinoff.ReplyDelete
By the way, the spinoff is called Idorsia Ltd.
It might be because Actelion is being removed from the main Swiss index this week ahead of the merger. I'm not entirely sure about this, but I believe in the US, companies typically aren't removed until after the transaction occurs, so if I'm right about that being the reason for the dip this week it could be a buying opportunity.Delete
Are you worried at all about the tax considerations: (page 40) file:///C:/Users/nugvader/Downloads/0652-Actelion_Ltd-Offer_Prospectus_of_Janssen_Holding_GmbH-20170216-en.pdfDelete
I can't figure out if the ADRs were tendered or not. I was hoping to be able to back into it based on how many shares the ADRs represent (in totality) but could not find that number.
Sorry. Hopefully this link works
Maybe others can chime in on the tax question? I don't have any insight or intelligent thoughts on whether it caused the spreading widening we saw last week.Delete
Any insight would be great. From speaking to Citi it doesn't sound as though they have tendered. I personally would be surprised if they didn't structure it properly such that all shareholders receive same tax treatment but I am no expert.Delete
I sold the ADR today (5/9/17) -- called up Citi, they just sounded too passive on how the ADRs will be treated for me to be comfortable. They're likely to sell the spinoff and distribute the cash, plus there's some uncertainty around tax withholding on the squeeze out, just doesn't seem worth the risk at just under $70. Will look at Idorsia once it starts trading (was still pending as far as I could tell yesterday).ReplyDelete
MDC - I held a single share of ALIOY through today to see what would happen. Today it looks like the share is gone from my account and I received only 69.87. Which essentially means I got less than just the regular cash payout and nothing for the R&D spin. I'm a bit surprised but happy I did the same as you and sold earlier.ReplyDelete
Ah nevermind. I also received a dividend of 3.96 in July. Total proceeds of 73.83 which is pretty good!!Delete
Thanks for the follow up. Yeah, I just didn't have the nerve to hold it after all the chatter around tax withholding, glad to hear it worked out more or less as planned.Delete
Anuj, what did your broker say about the Idorsia spin?Delete
I got one "dividend payment" and then one merger payout. I'm guessing the dividend was the spin payment. I can look up the exact language later.Delete