VICI Properties (VICI) is technically a spinoff of Caesars Entertainment (CZR), however it wasn't distributed to common shareholders, instead as part of the bankruptcy reorganization, former creditors of Caesars Entertainment Operating Company (CEOC) received shares in VICI Properties. Ownership in VICI Properties is essentially the same as being a senior (if not the most senior) creditor in the new Caesars Entertainment's capital structure. VICI owns the Caesars Palace property in Las Vegas along with 18 other CZR casinos (non-Las Vegas regional ones) that are critical to the operation of the business, absent these casino properties Caesars would struggle to exist.
Without even looking at comparable gaming REITs (MGP, GLPI) -- would you lend Caesars Entertainment money at a 7.4% effective yield with critical real estate as collateral? I would, again I'm bias because I own the equity too.
VICI is starting off with 19 casinos, 32.5 million square feet, ~12k hotel rooms, 150 restaurants, 4 golf courses and 53 acres of undeveloped land near the Las Vegas strip. Click on the below for a complete list of the properties.
- CPLV Lease Agreement: Covering just the Caesars Palace in Las Vegas, the company's flagship property, located in the center of the strip. Las Vegas is benefiting from positive tailwinds, record visitation levels in 2016, and the opening of the expanded Las Vegas Convention Center. The base rent is $165MM with an initial 15 year term and a 2% minimum escalator.
- Non-CPLV Lease Agreement: This is a master lease agreement covering all the non-CPLV casinos other than the Joliet property below and generally speaking, Caesars cannot vacate or remove a property from the master lease without triggering a default. Most of these casinos are mature stabilized casinos, some in good markets, others not, but the master lease agreement helps insulate VICI from regional downturns or other individual location risks. The base rent is $433MM with an initial 15 year term and a 2% minimum escalator.
- Joliet Lease Agreement: The Harrah's Joliet property (permanently docked riverboat casino) is 80% owned by VICI via a joint venture (other 20% is owned by John Hammons), thus it has a separately lease agreement with Caesars that functions similarly, just without the same master lease protections. Being somewhat local, I'd consider it a lower end casino in the area, the base rent is $39.6MM with an initial 15 year term and a 2% minimum escalator.
There are additional casinos (Harrah's Atlantic City, Harrah's New Orleans, Harrah's Laughlin) in the queue to drop down to VICI , giving it some built in rent and dividend growth from the start.
VICI also has the right of first refusal on any new domestic property proposed to be owned or developed by Caesars outside of the greater Las Vegas area. Caesars is itching to grow post emergence and has made it clear they intend to pursue M&A and other greenfield opportunities; partnering with VICI and its lower cost of capital on these efforts makes complete sense going forward.
MGM has its own REIT, MGM Growth Properties (MGP), that is similarly structured although MGM owns most of it as they chose to IPO a piece of it rather than a complete spinoff. MGP trades at about a 6.25% cap rate, and it's a better credit than CZR, plus most of the value in MGP is Las Vegas versus regional casinos and MGM has better growth prospects internationally. Gaming & Leisure Properties Inc (GLPI) is about the same size as MGP, but is entirely regional casinos, and is two major tenants are primarily regional operators in Pinnacle Entertainment (PNK, still own this one) and Penn National Gaming. I would say both are lower credits than Caesars, they operate primarily outsides of Las Vegas, transferred substantially all of their real estate to GLPI (Caesars still owns their non-Caesars Palace Las Vegas real estate), and they don't have the scale or ambition to compete in international growth markets. GLPI trades for about a 7.3% cap rate. I'd argue that VICI should trade for only a slight discount to MGP at about a 6.5% cap rate.
Shares outstanding: 246.2 million shares
Market cap (@$18.50/share): $4.56B
Net debt: $4.61B
Enterprise Value: $9.17B
NOI: $685MM = 7.4% cap rate
FFO: $435MM = 10.47x FFO
EBITDA: $640MM = 14.32x EV/EBITDA
Another way to think of it, annual interest costs are $247.5MM, removing that from NOI leaves $392.5MM for common shareholders or a 8.6% cash yield that should grow (slowly) over time. Not an incredible deal, but I think investors will find it attractive in today's market? Over the next year or so as the company joins the ranks of is peers in paying a dividend and up-listing to a normal exchange, it'll pull some of those gains forward. Due to leverage, small differences in the assumed cap rate change the math pretty quickly, at a 6.5% cap rate, VICI shares could be worth ~$24. An additional reference point, the Caesars recently issued senior notes at a coupon of 5.25%, others can speak better to the credit differences between the notes and the master lease, but it speaks to the improving credit quality of Caesars post emergence.
Why is it Cheap?
- VICI is essentially a bankruptcy reorg; its in the hands of former creditors (although highly sophisticated ones which explains why it's only marginally cheap) that are not natural long term holders of a REIT.
- The company currently trades over the counter, there's no bid/ask spread that I can see on my limited brokerage platform, its a bit tricky to get shares and liquidity is sporadic.
- It has yet to declare a dividend, there's no company website or investor presentation, nothing that would cater to the eventual retail REIT holder.
- VICI's only has one tenant in Caesars Entertainment, which just emerged from bankruptcy, one tenant REITs tend to initially trade at a discount until management has an opportunity to add to the tenant roster over time, although MGP trades at a premium, but its arguably a much better credit.
Each one of these items will dissipate over time as VICI lists on an exchange (no timetable set as of yet), declares a dividend (again, no timetable), and diversifies its tenant roster with M&A.
- Rising interest rates will hurt all REITs, especially ones that are essentially long term bonds like a triple net lease. VICI does have CPI linked escalators in their lease agreement with Caesars to help stem some of the blow, but quickly rising rates would hurt cap rates across the industry.
- VICI at the moment is all but in name a long term bond on Caesars Entertainment, that comes with its own risks, it just emerged from bankruptcy, more of a mid-market target demographic in Las Vegas and elsewhere compared to peers.
- Casinos aren't easily repurposed like other types of real estate, a distribution center or fast food outlet can be moved to another tenant fairly easily. For example, there are several empty casinos in Atlantic City (including the massive Revel) that are boarded up and would take significant capital to repurpose if it can be done at all.
Here's the 10-12 as its a bit hard to find, and no company website yet: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1705696/000119312517316387/d392523d1012ga.htm
Disclosure: I own shares of VICI and CZR
Thanks for write-up and the link to the 10-12. I'll definitely need to do some work on this. Has VICI management indicated that it'll take on non-Caesars tenants?ReplyDelete
Not yet, just an assumption on my part.Delete
How did you buy this stuff? I tried to buy it on Interactive Brokers without any luck. I was resigned to waiting till it was exchange listed. Aren't REITS required to pay out 90% of there earnings? https://www.sec.gov/fast-answers/answersreitshtm.htmlReplyDelete
It took a few days of trying before I was able to get shares, just a matter of patience?Delete
REITs do have to pay out 90% of taxable earnings. VICI will begin paying dividends, just nothing announced yet, my best guess is sometime mid-next year.
What exchange did you use? IB is saying it is on the "VALUE" exchange. I have access to most markets but it will not let me access this for now.Delete
No idea. I use Vanguard and was able to buy it, although it took a few days of trying to get filled, there's still no bid/ask spread listed.Delete
Did you put in a limit order? Or just a market buy order. Thinking of opening up a vanguard account to buy some of this.Delete
Limit order, always a limit order for something like VICI.Delete
Been buying some VICI shares through Etrade & Schwab setting my limit at the last price. It's been very slow going. Trying to buy 7k shares, and I have maybe done 600 over 4 days. Any suggestions (I guess the obvious one is raising my limit..)?Delete
Sorry, I don't have any sage advice other than patience. I'm sure you saw, but they filed an S-11 the other day, so sooner or later this will be a lot more liquid:Delete
Yeah. It's going to be interesting where they set the IPO price.Delete
Finally got filled in some size today in my Etrade account. Wish I hadn't forgotten to check back with the blog until 3 weeks after my initial question.Delete
It seems to have moved to the pink sheets w. actual quotes. Should make trading easier.Delete
What are you doing with Vistra since it announced merger with Dynegy? The combined company still has lower leverage than other comps, but this doesn't look the same as the thesis that uplisting and increased dividend will cause re-rating.
Right. I actually sold it last week because the thesis changed and I have similar electricity demand exposure/risk now with NACCO Industries.Delete
Makes sense - about Vistra. I think they couldn't resist growing bigger instead of putting a bigger dividend or share buyback. So the thesis has changed.Delete
What are your thoughts on RSO? They seem have to made good progress on selling non-core assets (2/3rd sold), but the market seems to ignore this progress.
Yes, I'm still fully onboard with RSO, they extended their 12-18 month time frame a bit by saying on the call they didn't really start until March, but otherwise still see it trading within 90% of book value in under a year.Delete
On STAR: Market does not seem to recognize the lawsuit money from Lennar, SAFE transaction that improved balance sheet, and refinancing of debt to push out due dates. I'm still holding.
MDC nice overview as usual. What is the AFFO per share for VICI, GLPI and MGP. How does VICI leverage compare with GLPI and VICI. I think one way to think about the value of VICI is to look at the combined valuation of VIVI and CZR. GLPI and MGP were created with the intent to create value for the pre spin shareholders ie., get a higher valuation for the REIT.Thanks.ReplyDelete
MGP is about 15x AFFO ($1.95/share) and GLPI is about 11.5x AFFO ($3.17/share), VICI does have more leverage than GLPI (7x versus 5x).Delete
I don't know if I understand the difference between VICI's creation and GLPI or MGP? Not sure the intent really matters, and VICI was created to create value or at least preserve value?
It looks like FFO and EBITDA are lower as SEC doesn't allow inclusion of pro-forma SG&A costs ($22-24 million) see presentationReplyDelete
Ah darn, thanks, missed that apparently. On the positive side, they disclosed the option to buy the three properties is at a 10% cap rate, almost a gift. Not going to get rich on VICI but seems like a good relative value trade.Delete
VICI might be short lived as a standalone company, MGP made an offer in December.