HGV ran into some accounting noise and operational/timing issues with their inventory strategy that caused a selloff in their shares opening the door for an activist or an unsolicited bid. In August, the NY Post reported that private equity behemoth Apollo Global (APO) was interested in making a bid for HGV. Apollo previously took unbranded (and somewhat controversial) timeshare operator Diamond Resorts International (DRII) private in 2016, and tried to re-list shortly after in 2018 but pulled the IPO. Apollo clearly got feedback that the public markets weren't interested in an as-is Diamond Resorts (they've recently dropped the "International" from their name) at an acceptable valuation to Apollo, so they need a plan B. It appears plan B could be to take HGV private and merge it with Diamond, re-brand the HoldCo and bring it back public without the same Diamond brand stench. Some point to the risk that Hilton needs to consent to a merger, this is true, but it seems contemplated that HGV would be acquired or operate non-Hilton branded timeshare properties with the caveat that it would be operated separately from Hilton branded properties and without access to the loyalty program, from the 10-K:
We are able to operate vacation ownership properties under other brands (with no royalty due to Hilton) if we do so without using any Hilton IP or Hilton Data and they are otherwise separate operations from the Licensed Business.And they would likely lose the Hilton Grand Vacations name per the licensing agreement since Diamond has more units than HGV, again from the 10-K:
Under the license agreement, our right to use the Hilton Marks as a trade, corporate, d/b/a or similar name will automatically terminate if (i) the aggregate number of units of accommodation in our Licensed Business falls below two-thirds of the total number of units of accommodation in our entire vacation ownership business; (ii) we merge with or acquire control of the assets of Marriott International, Inc., Marriott Vacations Worldwide Corporation, Hyatt Hotels Corporation, Wyndham Destinations and Interval Leisure Group, Inc. or their respective affiliates and we or they use their brands in any business after such acquisition; or (iii) we become an affiliate of another Hilton competitor.It wouldn't be the first time potentially competing (is Diamond technically a Hilton competitor?) hotel brand flags were housed under the same corporate timeshare entity, ILG had the Hyatt brand and first merged with Vistana which housed Starwood's timeshare business before being brought back into the Marriott/Starwood fold when it was purchased by Marriott Vacations Worldwide (VAC). But the Hyatt timeshare properties remain at VAC, although they represent a much smaller percentage than Diamond's properties would be under a proposed HGV/Diamond merger. Why might Hilton consent? HGV pays a 5% royalty on all timeshare sales, this amounted to $100MM in 2018 (and essentially falls straight to HLT's bottom line), a well capitalized and scaled HGV is to their advantage, I'm sure the team at Apollo can come with a few slides showing how this revenue stream could grow in the coming years with Diamond cash flow being used to fund HGV inventory and growth.
The other buyer being mentioned is Blackstone (BX), they took Hilton private in 2008 but no longer have a significant investment in HGV having divested their stake in 2017. They're familiar with the business, but they'd be strictly a financial buyer and seem less likely to be the winner. Worth noting that Blackstone's president, Jonathan Gray, is also the chairman of Hilton, unclear if that matters but seems noteworthy. Additionally, I wouldn't count out Wyndham Destinations (WYND) being involved in the bidding process either (although their stock trades well below that of HGV), there are lot of potential synergies and HGV is part of the WYND's RCI exchange network, plus it could move WYND slightly up market and bring down Wyndham's persistently high loan loss reserve averages.
HGV's management at least acknowledges the benefits of industry consolidation, essentially confirming the rumors, from the most recent earnings call:
Stephen Grambling: Great, and I appreciate you can't comment on the reports out there on M&A, takeover stuff specifically, but how do you generically think about the positive and negatives of consolidation in the space, and perhaps tying in anything that’s specific to HGV?
Mark Wang: Yes, Stephen, it's Mark. I think we recognize the value proposition of consolidation in our industry and other industries. I think, from our perspective, some of the key reasons for consolidation is you want to improve your asset base, you want to strengthen your brand, and in this industry's case, you want to have the access to a pipeline of incremental new customers. So, I'd say, look, we've got a great set of assets and we have this great brand and relationship with Hilton, and we've talked about the tour pipeline that they provide us, and we've had a long and strong history of execution and growth. So, look, I think consolidation has been positive in the industry and we understand the rationale behind it.
Clearly he's speaking from HGV's attractiveness as an asset and not how an acquirer might help HGV, but I think his comments could apply to either Apollo/Diamond or Wyndham quite nicely, primarily access to Hilton's growing hotel and customer base needed to source additional timeshare owners.
In the latest round of bidding, Bloomberg reported Apollo's bid is $40 and the stock currently trades for $35+ showing some skeptism that the deal will be consumated. From a valuation perspective, HGV sits essentially in-line with VAC on 2020 estimates:
In 2018, VAC purchased ILG for a total enterprise value of approximately $4.7B on $365MM of EBITDA plus $75MM of synergies, for a fully synergized multiple of ~10.5x EBITDA. ILG had an exchange business that while low/no growth is a free cash flow machine and likely pushed the overall multiple up some. But let's say the number needed to finalize an HGV deal is $42, with no synergies that would be 10x multiple and using a $50MM synergy number gets it back down to just under 9x, quite attractive for control over a timeshare business with a quickly growing hotel chain like Hilton.
Other Thoughts:
Disclosure: I own HGV calls (also remain long WYND)
In the latest round of bidding, Bloomberg reported Apollo's bid is $40 and the stock currently trades for $35+ showing some skeptism that the deal will be consumated. From a valuation perspective, HGV sits essentially in-line with VAC on 2020 estimates:
In 2018, VAC purchased ILG for a total enterprise value of approximately $4.7B on $365MM of EBITDA plus $75MM of synergies, for a fully synergized multiple of ~10.5x EBITDA. ILG had an exchange business that while low/no growth is a free cash flow machine and likely pushed the overall multiple up some. But let's say the number needed to finalize an HGV deal is $42, with no synergies that would be 10x multiple and using a $50MM synergy number gets it back down to just under 9x, quite attractive for control over a timeshare business with a quickly growing hotel chain like Hilton.
Other Thoughts:
- Elliott Management was rumored to be involved in HGV, but it doesn't show up in their recent 13F, probably doesn't mean anything - maybe they never owned it, but worth closing that loop.
- HGV offers a fixed/week interval product while Diamond Resorts uses a points based product, maybe a little additional culture clash to be concerned about, or Apollo could see an opportunity to modernize HGV's product into a points based system (one benefit of the points based system for the timeshare operator is its easier to sell upgrades to existing owners)
Disclosure: I own HGV calls (also remain long WYND)
Great to read all these posts! HGV seems quite interesting. Asta was a top-5 position for me pre-offer (and now is top-3) and I'm looking for a replacement; will mention the candidate(s) here if I find same.
ReplyDeleteThanks - had a few of these in queue for a while but life sometimes gets in the way of posting.
DeleteNicely done on ASFI
Missed this in my write-up, but the discount to the Bloomberg reported bid is likely due to the $40 being some indicative value of a combined HGV/DRII as suggested in the NY Post article as a way for DRII to come public. Much less interesting if that's indeed the case versus cash.
ReplyDelete