One of my early successes was Gramercy Property Trust (GPT), originally a busted up commercial mREIT (favorite theme of mine) which following the financial crisis transformed itself into an industrial triple net lease REIT before eventually selling itself to Blackstone in 2018. The architect of that transformation and value creation story was Gordon DuGan, one of the few CEOs I've kept a Google alert to keep tabs on where they go next. Last March, DuGan popped back up as the new Chairman of Griffin Industrial Realty (GRIF is the old symbol), Griffin was an accidental real estate company, a 1997 spinoff from an operating company, Griffin spent the following two plus decades operating in the relative shadows slowly building out an industrial portfolio -- first in Hartford on historical land holdings and later expanding to PA, Charlotte and Orlando. Bringing in DuGan signaled a transition for the company, late last year Griffin announced they would be rebranding as INDUS Realty Trust (INDT) and converting to a REIT. On the investor day last fall, DuGan admitted to have never heard of the company prior to meeting the CEO at a REIT conference, but today I think the company is interesting (more of longer term value investment than event-driven) because:
- This is a jockey play, Gordon DuGan is a proven capital allocator, he did this once before, I have confidence he can do it again. This is a somewhat similar playbook to GPT, take a small-cap industrial REIT (~$450MM) that is small enough to do one-off deals, institutionalize it, in the process the valuation re-rates up to the more liquid large-cap peers.
- Industrial REITs are richly valued, they trade for ~4-5% cap rates and have been major covid beneficiaries as ecommerce "last-mile" logistics and inventory management have become more critical. INDT's growth is not in acquiring assets, but rather acting as a developer, industrial/logistics buildings are relatively cheap and quick to build, the arbitrage between yield on development costs and market cap rates is wide at this time.
- INDT raised a significant amount of equity this week in a secondary offering at $60, possibly weighting on the trading dynamics in the short term and creating a buying opportunity. The equity raise is accretive to the long term value as that capital is put to work into new projects at attractive yields and it also helps improve the liquidity of the shares.
The current industrial portfolio is heavily skewed to the Hartford market where INDT had much of its undeveloped land, purchased long ago and some of that land is still held on its balance sheet at historical cost. The company's strategy to diversify away from Hartford, instead focusing on their other markets of Lehigh Valley (PA), Charlotte and Orlando.
They point to the age and size of their assets as a differentiator, their buildings are newer and focused on the mid-sized market which provides them a lot of flexibility in the types of tenants they can attract while still being economical from a cost perspective. I don't have a lot to add to their current portfolio, seems reasonably high quality with a diverse tenant mix.
Why INDT is unique is their ability to grow through development versus needing to rely on making sizable portfolio acquisitions to move the needle. I'm generally a sucker for real estate development companies, my view is the market has a hard time valuing development assets correctly as they're non cash generating and thus not great for the REIT structure or investor base. The problem with development companies is typically the long construction cycle, if for instance you're HHC, its 2018 and makes perfect sense to build a beautiful high rise office building on the Chicago River, by the time its complete in 2020, there's a pandemic and people are questioning if they'll ever go back into the office again. A lot can happen in those two years before construction is complete and even longer to bring it to stabilization. With industrial warehouse type properties, the construction is pretty quick and simple, 9-12 months, the product type is pretty homogeneous, you don't need a fancy architect to attract top tenants. The timeframe from shovels in the ground to stabilization is shorter and the certainty of projected cash yield is firmer on construction costs. This is a less risky form of development with much of the same upside.
INDT has historically been able to earn 7.7%-8.1% cash yields on their development costs, their current projects are estimated more in the 6.0%-6.5% range (guessing the difference is land cost, historical cost versus current market in their new developments), but with stabilized assets trading in the 4%-5.5% range, there's a lot of margin available to INDT's development platform to create shareholder value.
This week, the company issued equity at $60 per share giving them ample capital to pursue additional development opportunities later this year. To illustrate what I think the company could be worth once this capital is put to work, I created the below back of envelope math.
As you can see, the market is roughly valuing INDT at a 6% cap rate with little value being given to their development pipeline. The math could really go in INDT's favor if they're able to issues shares closer to NAV or even above (many industrial REITs trade at a premium to NAV) creating that virtuous cycle that all REITs strive to get. In summary, you have a proven capital allocator in a subsegment of the real estate market that should have continued tailwinds post-covid with a decently long but safe development pipeline to create significant value.Disclosure: I own shares of INDT